Market View – The bearish case for silver & Treasury notes
January 2012
While my call to short silver in this column in April near its parabolic climax at $48 proved profitable, I am still skeptical about its prospects now that it has fallen to $30. Naturally, fear and loathing in gold and margin calls on COMEX has provided the ballast for the latest silver shock. As an industrial metal, the white metal is not exactly the metal flavour de jour on the eve of a global economic slowdown. Silver fell 7% in a single session in mid December so it cannot remotely be relied upon as a “safe haven” asset. Moreover, the plunge since the $50 April high has triggered massive speculative losses and changed the trading behavior of the silver market, a vivid example of George Soros’s theory of reflexivity.
Silver has violated long term bullish trend line in the charts and the proverbial silver bulls, the heirs to the Texan Hunt brothers, have been painfully divested from their “animal spirits”. After all, silver plunged to $8 in the global credit seizure after Lehman Brother’s failure and the onset of recession in the twilight months of 2008. Why should another European sovereign debt/banking shock and a dollar spike not trigger a silver bottom to $18-22 in 2012? Thinking the unthinkable is not mere cerebral frolic in the world of precious metal trading but a lifeline for investors in silver. So while I do not claim $18 silver is inevitable, it is definitely not unthinkable.
The 10 year US Treasury note yield has plunged from 3.78% in early 2011 to as low as a recent 1.8% despite the US sovereign credit downgrade and the dysfunctional budget politics of Washington DC. Uncle Sam’s long duration IOU’s are now the world’s ultimate safe haven asset class as gold, German Bunds and the Swiss franc, have proved sad sacks. Yet there is a scenario that could lead to a bloodbath in the Treasury bond market whose probability, I contend, is non-trivial.
What if US economic data improves as payrolls, retail sales, capex and house prices rise? What if Berlin decides it cannot allow the 50 year dream of Monnet and Schuman to die in the debt firestorm of Athens, Lisbon, Rome and Paris? What if China manages a soft landing with 9% GDP growth and no banking crisis in the Middle Kingdom? The world is so surreal now, nowhere more so than the Treasury bond market.
The yield on the ten year note is down 120 basis points since the S&P500 downgrade of Uncle Sam’s AAA debt. The world’s hot, smart and dumb money is up the wazoo long bonds. Yet the Bernanke Fed’s pledge to continue 0 – 0.25% rates is conditional on soft growth and minimal inflation risk. Take out these conditions and the ultimate pain trade in debt becomes all too possible. If T-bond yields rise to 3.5% or, horror of horrors, 4.5%, the inverse long duration Treasury debt ultrashort fund (symbol TLT) could soar triple from its current 17-18 level. Yes, triple to 50-54. Will it? Quien sabe? Time will tell, as always!
Macro Idea – Short Zynga and Brent, long Citigroup!
I had advised my readers not to buy the Zynga IPO as its business model (churn rate, revenue monetization, new games cannibalization, dependence on Facebook, serial acquisitions, Mark Pincus’s CEO for Life voting shares) and its valuation made no sense to me. This call was vindicated by Zynga’s (symbol ZNGA) failed IPO. The shares fell to $9.50, below the $10 IPO offer price. I believe Zynga is still obscenely overvalued and can well fall to $7 or even lower. This is a classic twenty first century dot.com/social gaming bubble and has no business trading at $7 billion or 7 times revenue. Zynga dominates social gaming and Kleiner/Avalon/Foundry do not plan to sell their stakes so $7 could well be a floor for now. Yet it is crazy to value Zynga more than four times the value of Electronic Arts, no matter who makes the apples-oranges argument. As I remember from the offplan flipping times, we wuz born at night but we wuz sure not born last night. Mark my words. This puppy (Zynga IPO) is bad news and headed south on NASDAQ.
In life, as in markets, it is easy to trade consensus and meekly accept conventional wisdom. Yet this sort of intellectual flabbiness violates my contrarian DNA. This is not to argue that contrarian positions alone create value. After all, as Dr. Kissinger observed, even paranoiacs have real enemies. Take Citicorp (OK, Citigroup). The shares were savaged by Chuck Prince’s failed mother of all subprime/CDO bets, a Sophoclean tragedy that has taken the shares down from, a pre- split price of 520 in 2007 to 27 now. George Soros is so right when he says the big money is made when things go from Godawful to just plain awful. Gulf sovereign wealth funds lost tens of billions bottom fishing on the Citi that never sleeps (neither do its shareholders!).
Citi’s fall from grace has been tragic and there is no shortage of bearish news – the Fed stress tests, exposure to Club Med sovereign debt, Dodd Frank, Volcker Rule, the rise in bank funding costs, a flattish yield curve, sluggish capital markets new issue trading/underwriting, China’s hard landing risk. But Citi trades at a 50% discount to its tangible book value at $50 while Basle Tier One Capital is almost 12%. Voila, as the poet Saadi lamented, it is always darkest before dawn, as it was usually was during the Mongol invasion of pre-Safavid Persia. Vikram Pandit has repositioned Citi as an emerging markets bank, 2012 consensus EPS could be $4.30 and the Citi Holdings run rate can well accelerate. A double bagger in Citi in 2012? Why not? Yet Citi’s gross exposure to Europe, the epicenter of credit Armageddon, is $20 billion. The $4.20 EPS could be slashed down to $2 and the shares fall 50% Caveat Emptor.
I seriously believe a major fall in Brent is possible in 2012. If Libya and Iraq production surges while OPEC pumps 31 MBD, Riyadh pumps 10 MBD and global fuel oil demand falls even as the dollar spikes, Brent can plummet to $65. No typo here, amigos. A 40% hit in black gold. Iran? Sure, but oil prices fell to $7 while Iraq and Iran traded Scud ballistic missiles, battled in the streets of Khorramshahr and Fao , bombed tankers in the Gulf in the 1980’s. Yemen and Syria export miniscule high sulpher oil or LNG. The post-Khomeini era could see a US-Tehran rapprochement. Short Brent. Watch Pakistan and Hungary’s CDS creep above 800 basis points. A EM massacre is imminent in Budapest.
GCC Focus – The bullish case for Omantel
Oman’s MSM index has lagged the GCC, a compelling reason for me to once again cross the Hajar Mountains with securities traders and Excel cowboys in tow. I believe Omantel has money making potential in 2012, thanks to its lovely dividend yield, free cash flow and the broadband ballast in its revenue model, particularly as it gains mobile market share while new networks/product offering. There are few other places in the world where I have an iron clad guarantee of 8.5% dividend yield but this is entirely possible in the Sultanate’s incumbent telco Omantel. I expect EPS estimates are way too modest, fund manager positioning is entirely underweight and allocation of more 3G spectrum/licensing of mobile LTE is entirely possible.
However, I am unequivocally interested in Omantel if its shares fall below OR 1.20. As I believe Brent crude oil is due for at least a $20 fall in 2012, it is entirely possible that I might be able buy Omantel at 1.14-1.20 Omani riyal, particularly as government spending boosts liquidity in the economy and higher bank loan growth seep into the MSM. Oman’s stock market was the GCC Cinderella in 2011. However, sometime in 2012, I expect Oman to be the GCC’s premier market as Cinderella eventually goes to the fairy tale ball.
Saudi Telecom’s multiple catalysts include acquisitions in MENA at bargain basement prices and the listing of Viva on the Kuwaiti stock exchange. STC has a 28% stake in Viva and a successful floatation could set a precedent for some of its Southeast Asian telecom assets. STC is primarily a dividend play at 7.5% and its shares offer value anywhere in the 25-28 SR range for a 35 target. True, STC 3Q was a horror, with an annual decline of 53% in earnings due to a $230 million forex loss and a $30 million government mandated provision. Yet STC shares have plummeted since the earnings report and now offer deep value metrics. Obviously, the FX loss was due to Oger Telecom’s exposure to the South African rand and the Turkish lira, both victims of a higher dollar, having lost 20-28% of their value.
Etisalat 3Q proves quite clearly that the UAE telecom market is hyper-competitive/saturated while its franchises in Nigeria, India, Pakistan, Egypt and Sudan are in some of the most risky and unstable emerging markets in the world. Political unrest, recessions, devaluations and wars in MENA, Africa and South Asia are clearly negative for Etisalat’s bottom line, EPS growth and margins. The legal issues against Etisalat’s Indian subsidiary is also a negative overhang against the share. There simply is no compelling strategic or valuation catalyst to buy Etisalat shares at current levels.
Saudi Arabia’s Mobily is a play on the broadband revolution in the kingdom (smartphone/tablets definitely helped by youthful Saudi demographics) and its potential rising market share metric. Besides, unlike STC, Mobily does not have emerging markets FX risk! Zain is restructuring and it is impossible to calculate its franchise value for now.
Stock Pick- The biggest losers in Emerging Markets in 2012
Emerging markets had an annus horribilis in 2011, grossly underperforming the S&P500 or even MSCI World. While Arab states afflicted with political convulsions like Egypt lost half their value, even Brazil, India, Turkey, Russia, South Africa and China lost 20 – 30%. To add insult to injury, once favourite high yield EM currencies like the Indian rupee, Turkish lira, South African rand and Brazilian real were all the losers in global FX. What were the common themes behind the emerging markets Black Death?
One, capital outflows amid global risk aversion due to the protracted Eurozone sovereign debt crisis. Two, excessive monetary tightening to combat inflation by key central banks (RBI, PBOC, Banco do Brazil, RBSA, etc). Three, higher dollar and fall in commodities prices. Four, a steep fall in export growth and industrial production. Five, unsettled political unrest that ranged from the Wukan village revolt in China, the Arab (and now Russian spring), the telecom scandals in India. Six, exodus of international bank funding from Eastern Europe and the Arab world.
It is easier for me to predict the losers than the winners in the EM sweepstakes for 2012. Hungary exports almost half its GDP to a Eurozone on the brink of recession, the political elite in Budapest have lost investor credibility and forint devaluation is inevitable. Poland and the Czech Republic’s currencies and stock markets will also be collateral damage victims of a Hungarian devaluation, even though Prague and Warsaw are also major exporters to the EU. This will happen even as Austrian, Italian, French and German banks slash credit line to Eastern Europe, making them loser numero unos in EM. Classic shorts, in my view.
My second bearish bet is India, though the easy money has been made on both short Sensex, short ICICI New York ADR and short rupee positions since October 2010. As India’s economic growth rate plunges, earnings estimates on Sensex and the index valuation will both move lower. I expect EPS for Sensex at 1200 rupee and 11 times earnings or 13000 Sensex as a target.
China and Brazil demonstrate that EM “decoupling” arguments are fantasies, that Shanghai and Sao Paulo are both leveraged to the global growth cycle via exports and commodities prices even while “open economies” like Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea suffer from the contraction in world trade.
Ironically, the winners in 2011 were smaller EM’s that dance to the beat of their own liquidity and macro drummers- Venezuela, Mongolia, Pakistan, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand.
I am not sanguine about EM in early 2012 as growth will simply not stabilize, let alone accelerate, in BRIC as the Eurozone slowdown begins. Note that Shanghai fell below 2170 the same day Chicago VIX was 21 and Russia trades at six times earnings with $108 Brent and Iran war games on the Straits of Hormuz. I would short Budapest, Prague and Warsaw against the broad EEM index fund and remain short India, long Thailand and the Philippines. South Korea’s Kospi is yummy anywhere below 1750.
___________________________________
Researched & compiled by Matein Khalid